Carolyn B Lamm
Office:
701 Thirteenth Street, NW
20005
City:
Washington
State:
District of Columbia
Country:
USA
Tel:
+1 202 626 3605
Fax:
+1 202 639 9355

Questions and Answers:

Who's Who Legal Thought Leaders - Arbitration

Carolyn Lamm is a partner at White & Case. She has acted as lead counsel in international arbitrations in ICSID, ICC and other fora, as well as related litigation in US Courts for foreign states, foreign state-owned companies and foreign corporate entities. She is an arbitrator on the ICSID List, first-nominated by the US and the government of Uzbekistan. She has served as arbitrator in proceedings before ICSID, SAIC, ICDR, AAA, etc. Carolyn teaches international investment arbitration at the University of Miami. She is a member of the ICCA governing board; on the council of the American Law Institute; counsellor for the Restatement 4th of Foreign Relations; member of the advisory committee for the Restatement of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration; a past president of the DC Bar; and a past president of the American Bar Association. She is also chair of the board of the American-Uzbekistan US Chamber of Commerce.

DESCRIBE YOUR CAREER TO DATE.

I acted as trial attorney at the US Department of Justice civil division in the attorney general’s programme for honor law graduates. From 1980 to present I have been at White & Case LLP in Washington, DC. From 1982 I began representing parties in ICSID arbitrations: respondent states and corporate claimants in some of the largest investment arbitrations.

WHAT MOTIVATED YOU TO PURSUE A CAREER IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION?

I pursued a career in international arbitration because I love advocacy; international law; and people of different legal systems, cultures, religions, and economic and political systems. All have been fascinating and provide a stimulating and intellectually enriching practice.

WHAT DID YOU FIND MOST CHALLENGING ABOUT ENTERING THE WORLD OF ARBITRATION?

At the time, in the early 1980s, the most challenging aspect of entering the world of arbitration was the dominance of European male academics. That is slowly evolving to become a very dynamic world with many challenging competitors and arbitrators, both male and female.

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION HAS RECENTLY COME UNDER FIRE FOR THE UNDER-REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN AMONG ITS PRACTITIONERS. WHAT STEPS DO YOU BELIEVE THE COMMUNITY NEEDS TO TAKE TO OVERCOME THIS CHALLENGE?

The current situation does require sustained promotion of women to assure equal representation. I am promoting the creation of a multinational task force on gender diversity and discrimination with all of the major arbitral institutions and international organisations as participants. This would provide guidance to promote gender diversity among counsel, tribunals, and end users. Within law firms, we need to give women opportunities but also to promote to our clients the use of women on tribunals, etc. We are on the cusp of moving forward but it takes a sustained effort on the part of us all.

TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE EMERGENCE OF NEW REGIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRES AROUND THE WORLD, SUCH AS THE SIAC, HAD AN IMPACT ON THE POPULARITY OF “TRADITIONAL” ARBITRAL SEATS?

The emergence of new regional arbitration centres around the world has really had an impact on the popularity and selection of traditional arbitral seats. While the courts and the jurisprudence in many of the established jurisdictions provide comfort to users, the extraordinary secretariats, rules, facilities and innovative courts in many of the regional centres similarly provide very credible places to conduct arbitrations much closer to the users, legal systems, communities, and operations.

SINCE YOU BEGAN YOUR CAREER, WHAT HAS BEEN THE BIGGEST CHANGE YOU HAVE SEEN IN RELATION TO THE WAY THAT ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS ARE CONDUCTED?

Since I began my career – before computers – the biggest change in the way proceedings are conducted is that today so much is online, which is a fabulous change in terms of communication, organisation, access to vast quantities of information and facilitating the exchange of information. The real drawback has been that with keyword document searches, often tribunals are presented with hundreds of pages of narrative, thousands or millions of documents that are not sufficiently refined and selective to support a case, which can be overwhelming for opponents and tribunals. Some discipline and scrutiny of the keyword search output is needed to present more focused cases instead of what is just a mass of information that is not effective advocacy.

LOOKING BACK OVER YOUR CAREER, WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN THE PROUDEST OF?

I am most proud of some of the wonderful clients I have had the privilege to represent, jurisprudence I have contributed to the development of, and the very successful outcomes in many of the arbitrations. Just to highlight: Amco Asia v Indonesia, representing Indonesia; in Abaclat v Argentina, representing the 180,000 then 60,000 claimants successfully (due to a US$1.3 billion settlement); representing Uzbekistan in Metal-Tech, Spentex, and Oxus. Wonderful cases, wonderful precedent. And Fraport v Philippines, a long and contentious struggle that was ultimately successful for the Philippines.

WHAT ADVICE WOULD YOU SHARE WITH OTHER LAWYERS WHO HOPE ONE DAY TO BE IN YOUR POSITION?

My advice is to perform with excellence; leave no stone unturned when looking for and analysing the facts and the law; and be strong and clear analytically in your view of the law. Do your very best to serve your clients, 24/7.

Practice Areas:

Follow us on LinkedIn

Practice Areas

Firms

Browse Firms

Search Firms

The Who's Who Legal 100

Awards

News & Features

Special Reports

Events

Shop

About Us

It is not possible to buy entry into any Who's Who Legal publication

Nominees have been selected based upon comprehensive, independent survey work with both general counsel and private practice lawyers worldwide. Only specialists who have met independent international research criteria are listed.

Copyright © 2019 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 20 7908 1180 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.whoswholegal.com | editorial@whoswholegal.com

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK