Gina Cass-Gottlieb
Office:
L35, Tower Two, International Towers Sydney
200 Barangaroo Avenue
Barangaroo
NSW 2000
City:
Sydney
Country:
Australia
Tel:
+61 2 9263 4006
Fax:
+61 2 9263 4111

Questions and Answers:

Who's Who Legal Thought Leaders - Competition

Consistently ranked as one of Australia’s top-tier competition lawyers by clients, legal directories and peers, Gina is a recognised leader in complex merger clearances for acquisitions and industry consolidation. Gina has advised on some of the largest and most contentious and complex merger clearance matters for acquisitions and joint ventures in Australia and New Zealand, including PMP Limited on its proposed merger with IPMG Group and Tabcorp’s Tatts acquisition (co-competition counsel with HSF).

YOU HAVE STRONG EXPERTISE IN THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY. WHAT ATTRACTED YOU TO THIS AREA?

The financial services industry performs a critical role in the domestic and global economy. My introduction to the industry and its global structure and dynamics arose many years ago during LLM studies at Boalt Hall UCB where I studied payment systems, credit card scheme arrangements and the SWIFT rules. Since that time I was fortunate to have opportunities to advise and consult with financial services industry associations and institutions to address policy questions and design new regulatory frameworks. The industry continues to sit at the crux of key commercial, regulatory and policy questions. 

GILBERT + TOBIN HAS A MULTIDISCIPLINARY ECONOMIC AND LEGAL APPROACH TO COMPETITION LAW. HOW DOES THIS ENHANCE THE FIRM’S OFFERING TO CLIENTS?

Competition law matters and tests draw upon legal and economic analysis informing the investigative and adjudicative assessments of competition agencies, and the submissions and advocacy we offer to our clients. Our multidisciplinary approach enhances the depth, insight and efficiency of our practice’s offering in the way we investigate and understand our clients’ businesses, cost structures, market position and competitive dynamics and are able to represent them before regulators.

HOW WOULD YOU APPROACH CASES WHERE MERGER CLEARANCE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN REFUSED?

The critical elements are to understand the underlying reasons for the refusal and then to rigorously test what relevant parameters may have changed. Such parameters may include market entry, changes in demand, technological change, new regulatory obligations or industry trends that indicate that the previous competitive structure and dynamics have altered.

WHAT QUALITIES DO CLIENTS LOOK FOR WHEN APPOINTING COUNSEL TO ADVISE ON GLOBAL ENFORCEMENT MATTERS?

In these important matters clients look for a keen understanding of their global business and profile and the interaction of advice in each jurisdiction with other advisers in determining the best overall approach. This is matched with strong domestic expertise, experience and judgement. 

HOW, IF AT ALL, HAS THE CRITERIA UPON WHICH THE AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION (ACCC) REFERS MATTERS FOR A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION CHANGED IN RECENT YEARS?

The ACCC commissioners and senior enforcement staff have spoken recently, confirming that the Commission emphasises the serious nature of cartel conduct and will in most cases refer such matters for consideration by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) for criminal prosecution. The criteria referenced are set out in the Memorandum of Understanding between the ACCC and CDPP.

IN WHAT WAYS DO YOU EXPECT THE EXTENSION OF MARKET STUDIES IN AUSTRALIA TO IMPACT YOUR PRACTICE?

The Competition and Consumer Act does not expressly grant power to conduct market studies. However, a part of the Act, pertaining to prices surveillance, has provided powers under which the Commonwealth Government has initiated a series of market inquiries. Those inquiries have ranged widely, including across the energy, agriculture and financial services industries. The inquiries address market structural, behavioural and policy questions. 

This breadth of scope – for the clients, the subject of the inquiries and our practice in representing them – draws upon industry knowledge, multidisciplinary expertise and data analytical competencies.

WHAT CHALLENGES HAS THE CONCERTED PRACTICES PROHIBITION, INTRODUCED IN NOVEMBER 2017, POSED SO FAR, AND HOW DO YOU EXPECT IT TO DO SO IN FUTURE?

Concerted practices conduct, while well understood in European jurisprudence and guidance, prior to the November 2017 amendments was not part of Australian competition law. The new focus upon practices short of an understanding has introduced a need to review business conduct in broader situations, with particular focus on information disclosures, but not limited to that conduct. The challenge is to provide compliance guidance to recognise more risky conduct without chilling usual, productive and efficient interactions.

WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE GREATEST ACHIEVEMENT OF YOUR CAREER TO DATE?

As a senior practitioner, I am most proud of my endeavours as a mentor to women lawyers as they progress either within a law firm career, or in corporate counsel or business positions. As a competition law adviser I greatly value being trusted to advise corporate counsel, senior management and boards in critical matters, particularly ones with close engagement with regulators.

Biography:

Who's Who Legal Competition: Lawyers

Gina is a senior partner in Gilbert + Tobin’s competition and regulation practice.

Consistently ranked as one of Australia’s top-tier competition lawyers by clients, legal directories and peers, Gina is a recognised leader in complex merger clearances for acquisitions and industry consolidation. For the past eight years, Gina has been ranked as a “star individual” for competition and antitrust by Chambers Asia-Pacific, one of only 10 such lawyers in any discipline throughout Australia. In particular, Chambers Asia-Pacific 2017 states that Gina “continues to attract universal endorsement”, and describes her as “the leading competition practitioner in Australia” and the “queen of merger clearances”.

Gina has advised on some of the largest, most contentious and complex merger clearance matters for acquisitions and joint ventures in Australia and New Zealand. For example, she has recently acted with her partner Elizabeth Avery for Anheuser-Busch InBev NV / SA (ABI) in obtaining Australian regulatory clearance for their proposed global merger with SABMiller and Tabcorp’s proposed acquisition of Tattersall’s (co-competition counsel with Herbert Smith Freehills).

Gina has successfully represented clients in complex investigations and prosecutions by the ACCC for collusive, predatory, anticompetitive and other prohibited conduct. In addition, she has expertise in conducting Australian representation for companies accused of participating in international cartels, with a team of international counsel.

Gina is looked to for providing advice to senior management and boards of her clients. She provides written and oral advice at key times during merger and enforcement matters that exhibits keen judgement coupled with an understanding of the commercial context and the importance of risk management and corporate reputation.

Gina was a Fulbright scholar at the University of California, Berkeley, majoring in US competition law, financial institutions regulation and securities regulation. She is a director of the payment systems board of the Reserve Bank of Australia.

WWL says: The “terrific” Gina Cass-Gottlieb is “really well respected in the field” and is regarded as one of Australia’s leading names for competition, particularly in transactional matters.

This biography is an extract from Who's Who Legal: Competition which can be purchased from our Shop.

Other Practice Areas:

Follow us on LinkedIn

Practice Areas

Firms

Browse Firms

Search Firms

The Who's Who Legal 100

Awards

News & Features

Special Reports

Events

Shop

About Us

It is not possible to buy entry into any Who's Who Legal publication

Nominees have been selected based upon comprehensive, independent survey work with both general counsel and private practice lawyers worldwide. Only specialists who have met independent international research criteria are listed.

Copyright © 2019 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 20 7908 1180 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.whoswholegal.com | editorial@whoswholegal.com

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK