Who's Who Legal
Who's Who Legal
New to Who's Who Legal?
New to Who's Who Legal?
Menu
User Menu
New to Who's Who Legal?
Thought Leaders

Thought Leaders

Chris Osborne

Chris Osborne

Osborne Partners29 Throgmorton StreetLondonEnglandEC2N 2AT

Thought Leader

Thought Leaders - Arbitration Expert Witnesses 2020

Q&A

WWL Ranking: Thought Leader

WWL says

Chris Osborne is “a major player in the market”, hailed by peers as a “great” expert witness and a “long-established name in the field”.

Questions & Answers

Prior to founding Osborne Partners, Chris was the global head of FTI Consulting’s economic consulting segment. Before joining FTI Consulting, Chris was the European managing director of LECG LLP; and before that, the global head of Arthur Andersen’s economic and financial consulting group. Chris has more than 35 years’ experience in bringing economic and financial analysis to complex commercial and regulatory disputes. During the course of his career, Chris has been involved in more than 200 cases of litigation and arbitration, across multiple industry sectors. 

What inspired you to pursue a career as an expert witness?

I didn’t set out to have a career as an expert witness. Initially I worked on a mix of analytically driven problems – some commercial, some (especially in the 1990s) concerned with the regulation of newly privatised markets, and some that involved either litigation or arbitration. Over the past 20 years, though, the increase in the volume of international arbitration has meant that the expert witness work has increasingly come to dominate. I like it because of the range of countries, industries and issues that the work now covers.

How has the role of arbitration expert witness changed since you started practising?

I don’t think that the role has changed much in principle. There is, and always has been, analysis to be done, opinions to be reached, and answers to be explained, in writing and under cross-examination. The issues being covered, however, are from my perspective wider and more nuanced than they were in the early 2000s when many of the cases involved something close to expropriation. I think that experts now are more often drawn into issues of causation (as to the connection between an alleged breach and an identified harm).

What makes Osborne Partners stand out from its competitors in the market?

Right now, not so much! You could find a similar mix of economics and finance skills, and depth of experience, in a number of firms (not a very large number, but some). But watch this space.

What advice would you give to someone looking to start their own firm?

There is a stage in your career when it’s feasible. I think that people who are at that stage should have a bias in favour of their own firm (fewer conflicts, more interesting fee structures, better quality of life, etc). The key point for me, though, is whether what you are contemplating is really a vehicle for your own work, or something that you expect to continue on afterwards. If you are prepared to contemplate building a business, then I think it will be potentially very rewarding.

What role does arbitration have to play in a world that has been impacted by covid-19?

The covid-19 pandemic is likely to increase rather than reduce the number of cases, even if not initially. The process is harder in the current environment, but arbitrators, and practitioners, will have to learn to adapt. My impression so far is that technology provides a viable substitute for in-person meetings, and hearings.

What is the most complex aspect of commercial disputes in your experience as an expert, and how do you tackle it successfully?

Sometimes there is a natural way of looking at a problem that is wrong – in the sense of leading you to an apparently compelling but incorrect conclusion. Explaining why that happens, and proposing alternative perspectives, is hard. Economic theory can help (and covers many of the important and counter-intuitive facts of commercial life) but does not always lead itself to easy explanations. In truth I don’t always tackle this problem successfully. I am learning, though.

What steps can younger experts take to improve their chances of getting testifying appointments? Is there an important role to play here for experienced practitioners? 

There is no question in my mind that younger experts need help from more established experts. There are several ways in which that help can be provided, and the more established experts within a given firm need to be on the lookout for opportunities for their younger colleagues to take. Finding an area in which to specialise can help, as can all of the usual approaches to building a network of people who value your work. But the most important thing from my perspective is to work with someone more experienced who is prepared to look for opportunities to advance your own career.

You have enjoyed a very distinguished career so far. What would you like to achieve that you have not yet accomplished?

There is a lot still to do! By way of example, the analytical tools that we use haven’t changed much over the past few decades (since the 1980s, perhaps, when desktop computers first arrived and spreadsheet analysis became feasible; or the early 2000s, when internet-based research became easier). I believe that there will soon be another technologically driven disruption to the process of addressing quantitative questions in litigation and arbitration. I would like us to be early adopters.

Global Leader

WWL Ranking: Global Elite Thought Leader

WWL says

Chris Osborne is “a major player in the market”, hailed by peers as a “great” expert witness and a “long-established name in the field”.

Biography

Chris Osborne is an independent consultant. Chris was previously the global leader of FTI Consulting’s economic consulting practice. Prior to that he was the global head of Arthur Andersen’s economic and financial consulting group. Mr Osborne has over 30 years' experience in bringing economic and financial analysis to complex commercial and regulatory disputes.

During the course of his career, Mr Osborne has been involved in over 200 cases of litigation and arbitration, covering loss of profits claims, post-acquisition disputes, insurance claims and restrictive trade practices. He has worked on regulatory issues in the electricity, gas, media, post, rail, telecoms, and water sectors, working for regulators, incumbents and new market entrants, in the UK and more widely in Europe.

He has given oral evidence on over 30 occasions – in the UK’s domestic courts, as well as in London, Paris, Stockholm, Geneva and Singapore, in ICC, UNCITRAL and ICSID arbitrations. He has also given evidence in the US tax courts, in the US-Iran Tribunal, in the then Restrictive Trades Practices Court and in front of the then Monopolies and Mergers Commission.

He was named as one of five “most highly regarded individuals” in Europe in the expert witness analysis of WWL: Arbitration (2016).

WWL Ranking: Recommended

WWL says

Chris Osborne is definitely a “big name” in the European market and comes “highly rated” by peers for his first-rate quantum analysis.

Biography

Chris Osborne is an independent consultant. Chris was previously the global leader of FTI Consulting’s economic consulting practice. Prior to that he was the global head of Arthur Andersen’s economic and financial consulting group. Mr Osborne has over 30 years' experience in bringing economic and financial analysis to complex commercial and regulatory disputes.

During the course of his career, Mr Osborne has been involved in over 200 cases of litigation and arbitration, covering loss of profits claims, post-acquisition disputes, insurance claims and restrictive trade practices. He has worked on regulatory issues in the electricity, gas, media, post, rail, telecoms, and water sectors, working for regulators, incumbents and new market entrants, in the UK and more widely in Europe.

He has given oral evidence on over 30 occasions – in the UK’s domestic courts, as well as in London, Paris, Stockholm, Geneva and Singapore, in ICC, UNCITRAL and ICSID arbitrations. He has also given evidence in the US tax courts, in the US-Iran Tribunal, in the then Restrictive Trades Practices Court and in front of the then Monopolies and Mergers Commission.

He was named as one of five “most highly regarded individuals” in Europe in the expert witness analysis of WWL: Arbitration (2016).

Law Business Research
Law Business Research Ltd
Meridian House, 34-35 Farringdon Street
London EC4A 4HL, UK
© Law Business Research Ltd 1998-2020. All rights reserved.
Company No.: 03281866