Features RSS

Manufacturing Uncertainty: Plaintiffs’ Strategies to Avoid Their Burden of Proof

manufacturing

Emily Erixson and Leslie Packer, Ellis & Winters LLP

Solving patent licensing in an IoT world

Richard Vary

Richard Vary, Bird & Bird LLP More things are becoming connected. Wireless telecommunication is, gradually, becoming incorporated into all areas of our lives. 

“Early Certainty” in Inter-Partes Oppositions Before the European Patent Office

efe

Implementation of EPO initiatives call for revised strategies Jakob Pade Frederiksen, Inspicos In this article, Jakob Pade Frederiksen of Inspicos reviews the effects of the European Patent Office’s (EPO’s) Early Certainty initiative and the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) revision to inter partes opposition and appeal proceedings before the EPO, and provides recommendations to parties to safeguard their rights.

Compulsory Patent Licences in Germany

Andreas Falck

No Carte blanche for generics? Andreas von Falck, Hogan Lovells

Aqua Products: Amendments For the Rest of Us

akwah

Kenneth R Adamo, Eugene Goryunov and Noah S Frank, Kirkland & Ellis LLP* In a Leahy–Smith America Invents Act (AIA) post-grant review, section 316(d) of the Patent Act allows patent owners to file a motion to amend the challenged claims by “propos[ing] a reasonable number” of substitute claims. Section 316(e) also provides that “the petitioner shall have the burden of proving a proposition of unpatentability.” Until late 2017, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) placed the burden of showing the patentability of proposed substitute claims on patent owners. In Aqua Products v Matal, however, the Federal Circuit held that the PTAB must “assess the patentability of the proposed substitute claims without placing the burden of persuasion on the patent owner.” In other words, the Federal Circuit held that petitioners, not patent owners, bear the burden to show proposed substitute claims are unpatentable, a 180-degree shift.

Recent Canadian regulatory developments - OSFI releases draft Revised Corporate Governance Guideline

Stikeman

Stuart S Carruthers, Stikeman Elliott LLP In this article, Stuart Carruthers at Stikeman Elliott assesses recent regulatory developments in the Canadian market, highlighting particularly the draft of the Revised Corporate Governance Guideline.

Some features of the direct action against liability insurers under Belgian law: the Sunset Clause and direct action against foreign insurers

Lydian

Hugo Keulers, Lydian This article discusses two important features of the direction action against liability insurers under Belgian law. First, the Belgian Supreme Court has rendered an important decision regarding a discussion on the interpretation and application of the sunset clause in article 142 of the Insurance Act of 4 April 2014. Second, the Belgian direct action system is also much broader than the direct action that is allowed against indemnity/liability insurers in other EU jurisdictions. However, the application of the Belgian direct action in an international context has been challenged in Belgian case law.

The New 2017 FIDIC Suite of Contracts

Nicholas Gould

Nicholas Gould, Fenwick Elliott LLP The new FIDIC 2017 suite of contracts was launched in London at the FIDIC International Contract Users’ Conference in December 2017. The first edition of the suite was issued in 1999, and so 18 years have passed without revision. A pre-release version of the Yellow Book was unveiled on 6 December 2016 at the Users’ Conference in London, which resulted in further consultation, discussion and amendment before the 2017 second editions were concluded. The second-edition contracts include the Red Book (a traditional-build contract, so for construction only with design by the employer), the Yellow Book (a design-and-build contract) and the Silver Book (for EPC/turnkey projects).

Back to top

Follow us on LinkedIn

News & Features

Community News

Analysis

Features

Pro Bono

Corporate Counsel

Women in Law

Future Leaders

Research Reports

Practice Areas

Firms

The Who's Who Legal 100

Awards

Special Reports

Events

Shop

About Us

Research Schedule

It is not possible to buy entry into any Who's Who Legal publication

Nominees have been selected based upon comprehensive, independent survey work with both general counsel and private practice lawyers worldwide. Only specialists who have met independent international research criteria are listed.

Copyright © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 20 7908 1180 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.whoswholegal.com | editorial@whoswholegal.com

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK